Here’s an American eyewitness account of Aguinaldo’s arrival at Cavite:
“As I accompanied him from Hong Kong and was able to be of some service to him, I was received at his headquarters with great cordiality until after the arrival of the first detachment of troops. Admiral Dewey put him to shore in Cavite, gave him a great deal of ammunition and a few cannon, and he started to work. His campaign was wonderful and Admiral Dewey was greatly pleased. Aguinaldo took possession of one of the abandoned houses in Cavite, and at first he acted with great good judgment and simplicity. In a day or two the natives flocked into Cavite in droves, and as a small steamer arrived from Hong Kong, laden with arms and ammunition, in a week there were more than 1,000 men ready to take the field against the Spaniards in Cavite province.” (Stickney, 278)
“… Having been sent back to my prison, …I could see … the passing of wagons laden with arms, cannon, and ammunition, which would go to the landing and unloaded on cascos, small and large craft which came every day to this city with large masses of men whom I estimate would amount to more than four thousand. Vessels loaded with arms, ammunition and former insurgents would also come from Hongkong and afterward, I learned from those who visited me, after I was released from solitary confinement, that on the 28th of last month a column of three-hundred men of the Marine Infantry, commanded by Major Pazos, was captured between Imus and Kavite Viejo, and at the same time firing was heard on all sides of this province, which showed the general movement of the new revolution.
“I also learned that General Pena with his staff surrendered without exchanging a shot; surrendering cannon and other arms, public and Government treasure, with 200 volunteers from Apalit recruited by me, but which General Monet delivered to the Army Captain, Don Jesus Roldan. The news also came to me that the detachment of Bacoor composed of 200 volunteers from my regiment and over one-hundred men of the Marine Infantry, in command of Lieutenant Colonel, Don Luciano Toledo, having been besieged, … had to surrender; as did also the detachment of Baccor on the following day.“And thus, in less than six successive days, the detachments of Imus, Binakayan, Noveleta, Santa Cruz de Malabon, Rosario, Salinas, Kavite Viejo and other pueblos of this province which is now in the power of Don Emilio Aguinaldo surrendered.“But that is not all because there also came as prisoners from Kalamba, Binan, Muntinlupa and from the province of Bataan - among them the Governor and Administrator with their wives and daughters - 200 volunteers of the Blanco Regiment with its captain, Gomez, and 4 officers, besides 170 Cazadores with Lieutenant Colonel Baquero. Colonel Francia escaped to Pampanga, leaving the volunteers.“In a word: in eight days of operations, Don Emilio Aguinaldo has, here and in the conquered pueblos, 2,500 prisoners and more than five thousand arms, 8 cannon and a large number of friars, which has decided him to direct an attack on Manila, in combination with his forces from Bulacan, from this province, and those from that capital, which will amount to some thirty-thousand men armed with rifles and cannon; sending his forces from Bataan and Nueva Ecija to surround General Monet’s, who is in Pampanga, and those of Paciano Rizal in Kalamba to invade Batangas. (Taylor, v3:92-97)
Buencamino's account of Aguinaldo’s victory over the Spanish army is confirmed by U.S. General Thomas Anderson in this interview published in the North American Review of February 1900, viz:
"At that time [July 1898] the insurgent Filipinos had driven the Spanish soldiers within the defenses of Manila and had them completely invested on the land side by light field works, which they held with about fourteen thousand men. They were poorly armed and equipped, yet, as they had defeated the Spaniards in a number of fights in the field, and had taken four thousand prisoners, it may be asserted in the vernacular of the camp that they ' had the morale on them.' The Manila garrison was so demoralized at that time and so incomplete was their line of defense that I believe it would have been possible, by coming to an understanding with Aguinaldo, to have carried their advance works by storm and to have captured all of the city, except the walled city or the old Spanish town. Under existing orders we could not have struck a bargain with the Filipinos, as our Government did not recognize the authority of Aguinaldo as constituting a de facto government; and, if Manila had been taken with his co-operation, it would have been his capture as much as ours. We could not have held so large a city with so small a force, and, it would, therefore, have been practically under Filipino control. (Philippine Information Society, 7-8)
"...126,500 Americans saw service in the Philippine Insurrection, the peak strength of the American army at any single time was 70,000, and this army suffered battle losses of over 4,200 men killed and over 2,800 wounded. This represented a casualty rate of 5.5 percent, one of the highest of any war in American history. The financial cost of the war was over $400 million, a figure 20 times the purchase price paid to Spain. The insurgents suffered battle losses of 16,000-20,000 killed. In addition, perhaps 200,000 Filipinos died of famine, disease, and other war-related calamities. (Welch, 42)
"When I first started in against these rebels I believed that Aguinaldo's troops represented only a fraction... I did not like to believe that the whole population of Luzon... was opposed to us, but having come thus far, and having been brought much in contact with both insurgents and amigos, I have been reluctantly compelled to believe that the Filipino masses are loyal to Aguinaldo and the government which he leads.” (Blount, 24)
“The American people, champion of liberty, will undertake this war with the humanitarian purpose of liberating from the Spanish yoke the people which are under it and to give them independence and liberty, as we have already proclaimed before the whole world. … America is rich under all concepts; it has territories scarcely populated, aside from the fact that our constitution does not permit us to expand territorially outside of America. For these reasons, the Filipinos can be sure of their independence and of the fact that they will not be despoiled of any piece of their territory.” (Alejandrino, 89-90)
"It is an undeniable fact, proved by unquestionable evidence, accessible to any citizen who will take the pains to obtain it, that Aguinaldo's assistance in the war with Spain was solicited by United States officials; that he and his friends were used as allies by the American naval and military commanders; that, until after the capture of Manila, to which they contributed, they were allowed to believe that the independence of the Philippine Islands would be recognized by the American government; and that it was not until after the American forces in the islands had been made strong enough to be able - as was supposed - to conquer the Islanders, that the mask was thrown off. Independence was then refused them, and the purpose of the president to extend the sovereignty of the United States over them by military force was openly proclaimed. That the Filipinos resisted, and that they took up arms against foreign rule, was something that ought to have been expected; for it is exactly what Americans would have done." (Codman, 1)
Among the early publications that pictured Aguinaldo negatively is the one by Murat Halstead (1829-1908), which, just by reading the title, gives the impression that what is inside is part of a grand conspiracy to besmirch the image of Aguinaldo. The title reads: “The politics of the Philippines: Aguinaldo a traitor to the Filipinos and a conspirator against the United States; the record of his transformation from a beggar to a tyrant.”
Aguinaldo himself expressed his disenchantment at one time when he said:
"I have been loyal to America and the Americans. I have at all times acted upon their advice, complied with their desires, yet in their daily journals they endevour to humiliate me before my people. They call me thief, renegade, traitor, for no reason. I have done them no harm; I have assisted them to their ends, and they now consider me their enemy. Why am I called a renegade, traitor, thief?" (Sheridan, 90)
Paradoxically, we see today a memorial in honor of McKinley. Why should the Filipinos dignify this hypocrite by naming after him a major thoroughfare that runs through the most expensive piece of real estate in the country terminating at the beautiful park in the plush commercial center in Taguig? Either Filipinos are gullible or they are ignorant of their history.
Here is how Quezon was viewed as a politician:
". . . Quezon was ingratiating and charismatic, a brilliant orator and a consummate politician. He was audacious, resourceful, unencumbered by integrity, and capable of shrewdly using his political strengths to mold public opinion. His assessments of those with whom he dealt were unerring. He manipulated where he could – Filipinos and Americans alike – and used the electoral process to bludgeon those Filipinos who challenged him. He equated political opposition with enmity and was ruthless in dealing with influential Filipinos who were loyal to rival leadership or to abstract ideas that incurred his ire. These qualities were moderated only by the transfer to himself of the loyalty of Filipinos buffeted by his combativeness or their withdrawal from the arena of insular politics." (Golay, 166)
Bonifacio was hijacked to serve as the key component of the
configuration. He is made to represent the rallying symbol of their
advocacy because in the structure of their concept Bonifacio personified the
masses, while Aguinaldo was the elite, therefore, the enemy. The two
heroes were pitted against each other as a way of reliving the leadership
conflict of the revolution This conflict
was made to represent the supposed contemporary and continuing class struggle
in the Philippines. And to make the complex leftist ideology easier for
the youthful minds to absorb, the supposed class struggle was hitched to the
Bonifacio-Aguinaldo feud of old. In the process, the revolution of 1896
against Spain led by Bonifacio became the revolution of the leftist even if the
ideology was never a factor at the time, and by claiming the revolution was
that of the masses, it is effectively juxtapositioned to the present, because by
definition, the leftists are the masses.
Thus, for the uninitiated, to be a disciple of Marx and Lenin is actually an act of patriotism and therefore to
rebel against the established order is justified in the same manner that
Bonifacio’s revolution was. Of course,
this is a pure and simple web of insidious propaganda.
But apparently, the strategy works. The theoretical social conflict of masses
versus the elite that used to remain aloof in the minds of intellectuals has
now gone down to the level of the neophytes. This explains why the incessant
noise in social media about Aguinaldo being “hungry for power”, a “traitor”, or
“a murderer”, or “coward” is coming from the younger generation who hardly know
the history of their country or Aguinaldo’s contribution to nationhood.
(1) Aguinaldo was the first man to make the world conscious of the existence of the Philippines by leading two revolutions against Spain, and a war of defense of their newly established republic against the United States. As a consequence, he is the first Filipino whose name appears in the world encyclopedias.
(2) He helped to weld the Filipinos into a nation through deeds rather than by pen or words;
(3) He was the first man to demonstrate that a Filipino is capable of running an orderly government of his own making;
(4) He set an example of honesty, integrity, and incorruptibility in the government service;left happy memories of the First and Second Republics of the Philippines, and finally,
(5) He bequeathed permanent legacies to our people.(a) A Philippine independence day
(b) A Filipino flag, and
(c) A national anthem.
SOURCES:
(Credit to Sumaquel Hosalla, Tommy Matic IV, Ryan Aguinaldo, and Jomar Gelvoleo Encila for their contribution in putting together this paper)
Agoncillo, Teodoro: "Malolos: The Crisis of the Republic", University of the Philippines Press, Diliman, Quezon City, 1997.
Aguinaldo, Don Emilio: "True Version of the Philippine Revolution," Tarlak, P.I., 1899, University of Michigan Library 2005, http://name.umdl.umich.edu/AFJ2298.0001.001
Alger, Russell Alexander, “The Spanish-American War”, New York, London: Harper & Bros., 1901 University of Michigan Library 2005 http://name.umdl.umich.edu/ABZ6565.0001.001.
Alejandrino, Jose, "The Price of Freedom (La Senda del Sacrificio)", Episodes and Anecdotes about our Struggle
for Freedom, original in Spanish, by General Jose Alejandrino, translated into
English by Atty. Jose Alejandrino, prologue by Teodoro M. Kalaw, Manila,
1949
Bankoff, Greg, “A Tale of Two Wars”, Foreign Affairs, Nov-Dec 2002, Vol 81 No. 6, Council on Foreign Relations, pp. 179-181).
Blount, James H.: "The American Occupation of the Philippines, 1898-1912," New York, London, G.P. Putnam's Son, 1912, University of Michigan Library 2005, http://name.umdl.umich.edu/AHZ9397.1913.001
Garcia, Pantaleon, “Maikiling Kasaysayan ng Himagsikan sa Pilipinas”, Palimbag ng Dalaga, Maynila, 1930.
Garcia, Mauro, “Aguinaldo in Retrospect”, A volume Issued to Commemorate the Centenary of General Emilio Aguinaldo y Famy, With Documents on the Philippine-American War, (1898-1901), and the First Philippine Republic, edited by Mauro Garcia, Philippine Historical Association, Manila, 1969.
Golay, Frank Hindman, "Face of Empire", United States-Philippine Relations, 1898-1946, published in cooperation with University of Wisconsin-Madison Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Ateneo de Manila University Press, 1997.
Javar, Roderick C., “Biograpikong Manipulasyon sa Pro-Espanyang Partisipasyon ni Manuel Quezon at Kolaborasyon ng Kanyang Pamilya sa Panahon ng Himagsikang Pilipino”, U.P. Los Banos Journal, Volume 18, No. 1, January-December, 2020.
Ronquillo, Carlos: "Ilang Talata Tungkol sa Panghihimagsik ng 1896-1897," edited by Isagani Medina, University of the Philippines Press, 1996
Santos, Jose P., “Si Andres Bonifacio at ang Katipunan”, Akda ni Tenepe, Copyright 1948 by Author.
Saulo, Alfredo B.: "Emilio Aguinaldo, Generalissimo and President of the First Philippine Republic -First in Asia," Phoenix Publishing House, Quezon City, 1983;
Storey , Moorefield and Lichauco, Marcial P.: "The Conquest of the Philippines by the United States," New York and London, G.Putnam's Sons, 1926, University of Michigan Library 2005, http://name.umdl.umich.edu/AFJ2371.0001.001
Taylor, John R..M.: "The Philippine Insurrection Against the United States, a compilation of documents with an introduction by Renato Constantino," Eugenio Lopez Foundation, 5 Volumes, Pasay City, Philippines, 1971.
Veneracion, Jaime, “Bulakan ng mga Bayani”, Center for Bulacan Studies, Bulacan State University, 2007.
Welch Jr., Richard E.: "Response to Imperialism, The United States and the Philippine-American War, 1899-1902," The University of North Carolina Press, 1979